Authority
One of the most misunderstood aspects of Christianity—especially for soldiers—is authority. Modern culture tends to treat authority as a necessary evil at best, and a moral threat at worst. Power is assumed to corrupt. Hierarchy is assumed to oppress. Obedience is assumed to diminish moral responsibility. When these assumptions are imported into faith, the result is confusion: how can a Christian submit to orders, enforce rules, or wield force without betraying the teachings of Christ?
Scripture begins in a very different place.
Authority does not originate with governments, generals, or institutions. It originates with God. Before there are nations, armies, or laws, there is order. In the opening chapters of Genesis, God creates by separating, naming, assigning boundaries, and declaring purpose. Authority is not introduced as a reaction to sin; it is embedded in creation itself.
Adam is given dominion before the fall—not permission to exploit, but responsibility to steward. He is commanded to work, guard, and keep what has been entrusted to him. This is authority paired with obligation, not domination.
When sin enters the world, authority does not disappear—it becomes necessary. Human rebellion produces violence, and violence demands restraint. By Genesis 9, after the flood, God establishes accountability for human life, explicitly connecting justice with the sanctity of being made in God’s image.
Genesis 9:6 (ESV) “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image.”
This passage is not a celebration of violence; it is a recognition that unchecked violence destroys what God values. Authority exists, in part, to restrain that destruction.
As Scripture moves forward, God repeatedly establishes leaders to govern, judge, and protect His people. Moses does not seize authority; he is commissioned. Judges are raised up in response to chaos. Kings are anointed, not elected or self-appointed. Even when these leaders fail—and many do—the legitimacy of authority itself is never treated as the problem. The problem is always misuse.
The book of Deuteronomy makes this especially clear. Before Israel ever enters the land, God anticipates the dangers of centralized power and sets limits on kingship. Authority is granted, but it is bounded. Leaders are commanded to know the law, submit to it, and remain accountable to God.
Deuteronomy 17:18–19 (ESV) “And when he sits on the throne of his kingdom, he shall write for himself in a book a copy of this law… And it shall be with him, and he shall read in it all the days of his life, that he may learn to fear the Lord his God…”
Authority in Scripture is never autonomous. It is always delegated and always answerable to something higher.
This theme continues through Israel’s history. Prophets are sent not to abolish authority, but to confront it when it drifts from its purpose. Nathan confronts David. Elijah confronts Ahab. Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Amos speak against kings and rulers who use power to exploit rather than protect. The existence of prophets assumes that authority is real—but not ultimate.
By the time we reach the New Testament, the political landscape has changed, but the theological structure has not. Rome rules by force. Soldiers enforce imperial order. Yet Jesus never teaches that authority itself is illegitimate. He critiques hypocrisy, corruption, and abuse, but He acknowledges real lines of power.
When Jesus stands before Pilate, He does not deny Pilate’s authority—even as He submits to injustice.
John 19:10–11 (ESV) “So Pilate said to him, ‘You will not speak to me? Do you not know that I have authority to release you and authority to crucify you?’ Jesus answered him, ‘You would have no authority over me at all unless it had been given you from above.’”
This statement does not excuse Pilate. It places him under judgment. Authority exists—but it will be answered for.
Jesus reinforces this understanding when He speaks to His disciples about leadership. He contrasts pagan models of power with the responsibility of those who lead in God’s kingdom—not by eliminating authority, but by redefining how it is exercised.
Mark 10:42–45 (ESV) “You know that those who are considered rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them… But it shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant…”
Jesus does not say there will be no rulers. He says rulers must serve.
The apostles carry this framework forward. Peter addresses believers living under hostile authorities and urges submission—not because rulers are always righteous, but because order itself is preferable to chaos.
1 Peter 2:13–14 (ESV) “Be subject for the Lord’s sake to every human institution… for governors as sent by him to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good.”
Peter himself had suffered under unjust power. His call to submission is not naïve. It is grounded in the belief that God works through imperfect structures to restrain greater harm.
For soldiers, this matters deeply. Obedience is not moral laziness. It is participation in a delegated structure designed—however imperfectly—to protect others from worse evils. Scripture never claims this system is pure. It claims it is necessary.
At the same time, Scripture is clear that authority is real but not absolute. God never gives human leaders unlimited power over conscience. When an order requires a person to commit evil—when it demands what God has clearly forbidden or forbids what God has clearly commanded—obedience reaches its limit. At that point, a person is no longer choosing between obedience and rebellion, but between two kinds of disobedience.
The Bible does not pretend this is easy. It treats that moment as a moral weight placed squarely on the individual. Refusing such an order is not lawlessness; it is accountability. And accepting the consequences of that refusal without violence or revolt is part of what Scripture calls faithfulness.
This tension is not a mistake in God’s design. It is how moral responsibility is preserved in a world where authority is necessary but never perfect.
Daniel 3:16–18 (ESV) “Our God whom we serve is able to deliver us… But if not, be it known to you, O king, that we will not serve your gods…”
They do not overthrow authority. They draw a line within it.
This is the biblical vision of authority: established by God, exercised by humans, limited by moral law, and accountable to divine judgment. It is neither idolized nor dismissed. It is treated as a grave responsibility in a broken world.
The Church often struggles to articulate this because it requires holding two truths at once: authority is necessary, and authority is dangerous. Scripture refuses to simplify that tension. It insists that order without justice becomes tyranny, and freedom without restraint becomes chaos.
For soldiers, this framework provides clarity. You are not asked to pretend authority is perfect. You are not asked to surrender conscience. You are asked to recognize that your role exists within a structure God Himself acknowledges—one that demands humility, restraint, and accountability.
Authority is not man’s invention. It is God’s tool for preserving life in a world that continually threatens it.
And that makes bearing it a burden—not a contradiction of faith.
Content taken from “If You Are in the Armed Forces, This Is What the Bible Says About War, Obedience, and Conscience“ – Link
Matter Of Fact Books
Our books are priced to sell. We do not advertise so please spread the word.